Jamie Spears says the choose acquired it flawed … Britney ought to have to take a seat for a deposition and reply to all the allegations she’s made about him and her time within the conservatorship.
In line with authorized docs, filed within the California Court docket of Appeals and obtained by TMZ, Jamie says it is unfair the court docket dominated he needed to sit for a deposition whereas Britney can get away with out having to take a seat for one. The docs state, “The appropriate to take a deposition can hardly ever be denied. In California, discovery is a matter of proper.”
Jamie’s authorized group additionally argues Britney and her lawyer, Mathew Rosengart, didn’t set up good trigger to justify prohibiting her deposition … particularly given the actual fact she made numerous claims in opposition to Jamie for wrongdoing.
Jamie says if the court docket had a difficulty with Britney’s deposition, it might have restricted the matters or questions lined … however as an alternative, it simply shut her deposition down altogether.
Jamie’s authorized group says the one-sidedness within the trial choose’s ruling violates primary equity … that if one occasion has to take a seat for a depo, the opposite occasion ought to as nicely.
The trial choose dominated no matter Jamie needed from Britney may very well be obtained by means of writing. His authorized group clearly feels that would apply to him as nicely, and now they’re gunning for equal therapy — he sits for a depo, then she ought to as nicely.